Contract Performance (Prod)
Vendor and Contract Performance Feedback
Customer Information
Organization:
Contact Name:
Email:
Contract #:
03712
Lean Consultant Services
Performance Period:
-- Select Year --
2015
2016
2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr
to
-- Select Year --
2015
2016
2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr
Vendor:
-- Select Vendor --
w10814 - GRANT THORNTON LLP
w17337 - KOCER CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING PLLC
w20791 - CORAGGIO GROUP, LLC
w24058 - ETI CORPORATION
w24443 - WASHINGTON MANUFACTURING SERVICES
w2658 - POINT B, LLC
w27508 - HONSHA INC.
w27750 - CEPTARA CORP.
w32725 - TIMPCO LLC DBA KAUFMAN GLOBAL
w32915 - ICF INTERNATIONAL
w34495 - THE COOPER MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE, LLC
w37150 - MASS INGENUITY
w38937 - INTEGRIS PERFORMANCE ADVISORS
w39606 - ANNIK INC.
w40192 - QPIC, LLC
w40258 - CFS CONSULTING GROUP, LLC
Contract Usage:
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Vendor Performance
Would you like to see the current contract extended with the current vendor? (if applicable)
Yes
No
On time delivery and completion
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Timeliness of invoices
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Customer service courtesy and quality
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Accuracy of invoices
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Problem solving
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Overall vendor performance
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Reliability
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Communications
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Professionalism
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Interaction with in-house staff
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Use of approved standards, tools and methods
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Price Competitiveness
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Tell us about the times that the vendor has given you outstanding or unsatisfactory service:
Contract Quality
Deliverables on contract meet my needs (functionally and performance)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Contract pricing meets my expectations (cost effective and a good value)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Contract requirements meet my needs (special terms and conditions)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Length of contract term meets my needs (appropriate term for the market)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Scope of contract meets my needs (deliverables, features and options)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Suggested Changes To Contract
Add the following items to the contract (list):
Remove the following items from the contract (list):
Add the following features, services or options (list):
Remove the following features, services or options (list):
Change the following specifications (list items and specifications):
Other suggested changes (list):
Contract items not competitive with marketplace (list):