Contract Performance (Prod)
Vendor and Contract Performance Feedback
Customer Information
Organization:
Contact Name:
Email:
Contract #:
03994
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES-USER CALL
Performance Period:
-- Select Year --
2015
2016
2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr
to
-- Select Year --
2015
2016
2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr
Vendor:
-- Select Vendor --
10035-10 - CED LACEY
10035-11 - CED BREMERTON
10035-13 - CED BELLINGHAM
10039-6 - STUSSER ELEC CO - YAKIMA
10041 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC-BELLING
10043 - CED BREMERTON
10046 - PLATT ELECTRIC - PORTLAND
10046-1 - PLATT ELECTRIC - LONGVIEW
10047 - STUSSER ELEC CO - KENT
10051 - CARR SALES CO
10057 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC-EVERETT
10064 - WESCO - RICHLAND
1184 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC-BELLEVUE
1184-1 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC-BREMERTON
1184-2 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC-FED WY
1184-5 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC-SEATTLE
1184-7 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC-PASCO
1184-8 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC-EVERETT
13292 - STUSSER ELEC CO - OLYMPIA
13292-2 - CED BELLINGHAM
15062 - CONSOLIDATED ELECT - OLYMPIA
16732 - GRAYBAR ELECTRIC - TACOMA
26633-1 - STONEWAY ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
31808 - NORTH COAST ELECTRIC CO
37068 - INLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY
37494-1 - ALL PHASE ELEC SUPPLY CO
924-1 - GRAYBAR ELECTRIC - BELLEVUE
959 - CARR SALES CO INC
Contract Usage:
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Vendor Performance
Would you like to see the current contract extended with the current vendor? (if applicable)
Yes
No
On time delivery and completion
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Timeliness of invoices
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Customer service courtesy and quality
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Accuracy of invoices
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Problem solving
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Overall vendor performance
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Reliability
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Communications
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Professionalism
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Interaction with in-house staff
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Use of approved standards, tools and methods
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Price Competitiveness
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Tell us about the times that the vendor has given you outstanding or unsatisfactory service:
Contract Quality
Deliverables on contract meet my needs (functionally and performance)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Contract pricing meets my expectations (cost effective and a good value)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Contract requirements meet my needs (special terms and conditions)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Length of contract term meets my needs (appropriate term for the market)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Scope of contract meets my needs (deliverables, features and options)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Suggested Changes To Contract
Add the following items to the contract (list):
Remove the following items from the contract (list):
Add the following features, services or options (list):
Remove the following features, services or options (list):
Change the following specifications (list items and specifications):
Other suggested changes (list):
Contract items not competitive with marketplace (list):