Contract Performance (Prod)
Vendor and Contract Performance Feedback
Customer Information
Organization:
Contact Name:
Email:
Contract #:
04215
Mediation Services
Performance Period:
-- Select Year --
2015
2016
2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr
to
-- Select Year --
2015
2016
2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr
Vendor:
-- Select Vendor --
W1179 - TRIANGLE ASSOCIATES INC.
W14659 - ECO RESOURCE GROUP, LLC
W16694 - ACCORD & COLLABORATION
W25670 - ALHADEFF & FORBES & AFFILIATES MEDIATION SERVICES
W28982 - D DIAMOND CONSULTING
W32963 - MEDIATION FIRST, LLC
W34454 - WASHINGTON STATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTERS ASSOCIATION
W348 - WORKPLACE RESOLUTIONS, LLC
W37502 - DISPUTE SOLUTIONS LLC
W39043 - WONG FLEMING
W41014 - ACHIEVE CONSULTING TEAM, INC.
W45111 - PRENTICE MEDIATION
W45261 - KEARNS & WEST
W50184 - LUNA LEGAL LLC
W53887 - SKAGIT MEDIATION
W53968 - FARALLON CONSULTING, L.L.C.
W53993 - ORELIA HINES MEDIATION SERVICES LLC
W54001 - BALLARD LAW OFFICE
Contract Usage:
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Vendor Performance
Would you like to see the current contract extended with the current vendor? (if applicable)
Yes
No
On time delivery and completion
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Timeliness of invoices
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Customer service courtesy and quality
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Accuracy of invoices
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Problem solving
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Overall vendor performance
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Reliability
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Communications
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Professionalism
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Interaction with in-house staff
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Use of approved standards, tools and methods
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Price Competitiveness
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Tell us about the times that the vendor has given you outstanding or unsatisfactory service:
Contract Quality
Deliverables on contract meet my needs (functionally and performance)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Contract pricing meets my expectations (cost effective and a good value)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Contract requirements meet my needs (special terms and conditions)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Length of contract term meets my needs (appropriate term for the market)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Scope of contract meets my needs (deliverables, features and options)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Suggested Changes To Contract
Add the following items to the contract (list):
Remove the following items from the contract (list):
Add the following features, services or options (list):
Remove the following features, services or options (list):
Change the following specifications (list items and specifications):
Other suggested changes (list):
Contract items not competitive with marketplace (list):