Contract Performance (Prod)
Vendor and Contract Performance Feedback
Customer Information
Organization:
Contact Name:
Email:
Contract #:
05916
Motor Vehicles
Performance Period:
-- Select Year --
2016
2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr
to
-- Select Year --
2016
2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Qtr 1
Qtr 2
Qtr 3
Qtr 4
Qtr
Vendor:
-- Select Vendor --
W11525 - NORTHWEST HARLEY-DAVIDSON
W11732 - HASELWOOD COURTER ENTERPRISES, INC
W1675 - NORTHSOUND AUTO GROUP LLC
W23438 - NEWELL CORP
W262 - BUD CLARY CHEVROLET INC
W30668 - JRH LLC DBA POWERSPORTS NORTHWEST
W33920 - NISSAN OF THE EASTSIDE, INC.
W403 - CLARY LONGVIEW LLC
W42721 - SPOKANE MERCEDES-BENZ OF SPOKANE
W48491 - BYD MOTORS LLC
W49789 - RWC INTERNATIONAL LLC
W5343 - TEC EQUIPMENT, INC.
W59283 - ALAN WEBB NISSAN
W60074 - DONOLSON CORP.
W61385 - SCHARMACH ENTERPRISES
W61494 - TESLA, INC.
W6181 - RAYMOND HANDLING CONCEPTS CORP
W6870 - TOYOTA OF YAKIMA
W89448 - IRON HORSE HOLDINGS INC
W99634 - CLARY AUBURN VW LLC
Contract Usage:
Daily
Weekly
Monthly
Quarterly
Annually
Vendor Performance
Would you like to see the current contract extended with the current vendor? (if applicable)
Yes
No
On time delivery and completion
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Timeliness of invoices
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Customer service courtesy and quality
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Accuracy of invoices
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Problem solving
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Overall vendor performance
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Reliability
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Communications
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Professionalism
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Interaction with in-house staff
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Use of approved standards, tools and methods
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Price Competitiveness
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Tell us about the times that the vendor has given you outstanding or unsatisfactory service:
Contract Quality
Deliverables on contract meet my needs (functionally and performance)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Contract pricing meets my expectations (cost effective and a good value)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Contract requirements meet my needs (special terms and conditions)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Length of contract term meets my needs (appropriate term for the market)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Scope of contract meets my needs (deliverables, features and options)
Outstanding (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Poor (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A (0)
Suggested Changes To Contract
Add the following items to the contract (list):
Remove the following items from the contract (list):
Add the following features, services or options (list):
Remove the following features, services or options (list):
Change the following specifications (list items and specifications):
Other suggested changes (list):
Contract items not competitive with marketplace (list):